The progressive science of Wavevolution is the transformation
from waves to atoms and its correlation to new understandings of
the relation between Space and Time.
Wavevolution extends the concept of evolution to all forms of
energy through a process of gradual changes that transform waves
All elements have one electric charge, one counterpart and one
Mass-less does not exist. Symmetry is everywhere.
Neutral elements are composites of two opposite charges and are
not elementary particles.
Wavevolution is the energy transformation opposite to Nuclear
In Wavevolution all forms of energy constantly transform.
The same quantum of energy originally carried by any wave
becomes gradually fragmented and dispersed by the encountered
For example, quanta of gamma rays over time will lower their
potential to become X rays and X rays will gradually become
ultraviolet rays diminishing their original frequencies. The
initial quantum of energy is transformed into different forms of
energy through spontaneous symmetry breaking. Once they have
reached one critical level of energy (well below radio waves)
the waves collapse forming two subatomic particles with opposite
charges, as if they were the split ends of a broken hair.
Wavevolution shows how the behavior in waves and atoms is
identical and how this single movement common to all energy is
comparable to One Divine Will that creates the whole Universe.
This constant movement, Quantum mechanics, is here intended as
the natural Law of Attraction between two opposite and
complementary electric charges.
The discovery of the existence of One Universal Law that had one
beginning about 14 billion years ago and that was not caused by
Humankind confirms as a consequence the existence of One
All living beings, made up of atoms, are the ultimate product of
a slow process started with transformed waves.
New and Old Science:
In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck, one to show
the equation between atoms and energy and the other to discover
the constant between waves' frequencies and energy, traditional
science has not yet closed the circle.
Still today, science does not recognize the transformation from
waves to atoms.
The bureaucracy of traditional science prevents the recognition
of any event unless certain criteria are first met. The reason
why science could not progress is buried deep in the compilation
of these laws or criteria (like the "uncertainty
introduced by a few scientists in
the name of all science and from their erroneous understanding
of the relation between Space and Time.
This antiquated system of rules also results in misleading
For example, Space is not “curved”.
In Einstein's paradigm, a stone that falls on the ground from
the window of a moving train also marks one parabola in Space.
Although, this path is only apparent since the Earth is also
moving and the Time spent by the stone to reach the ground has
also changed to some degree that imaginary vertical line. At the
Time of the initial Movement when the stone falls from the
window its potential trajectory is one perpendicular Space that
is no longer the same as the stone continues to move until it
hits the ground. If the scientist had known that the coordinates
of Space in Time are unique and unrepeatable then all the rest
would have also been "straight". That perpendicular is straight
but accounted as “curve” because of the limits imposed to
science which make it impossible to recognize the concept of
simultaneity. In reference to any one body, on each moment in
Time, there are always only two coordinates in Space for one
And with two coordinates there is no curve.
One perpendicular is unrepeatable and never the same because
while the measure of it is repeatable and any measurement can be
applied for different segments instead one perpendicular marked
in Time will never again have that same spatial positioning.
The perpendicular changes in Time but Einstein believed that the
concept of Space is independent from the concept of Time.
Another example is in the special theory of relativity which
denies all absolutes and meanings of truth. This is in regard to
Einstein's example of two beams of light hitting one same
embankment of a railroad on two Points: Point A and Point B. In
between the two there is also the middle point, Point M. If one
train were to run over that track then on the train we would
also have Point A1 on the wagon of the train right above Point A
and one other corresponding Point B1 right above Point B. We
would also have on the train Point M1 above Point M. Einstein's
theory is that as for Point M (not moving because on the
embankment) those two beams are simultaneous and equidistant,
instead, for the passenger sitting on Point M1 and moving
towards Point B1 (and also toward Point B) the two beams are not
simultaneous because the beam in Point B1 is being approached by
the moving train, therefore closer to Point M1. In this example,
while Einstein’s concept of Time is rigidly kept unchanged in
regard to the embankment, instead, the concept of Space is
extended also to the next moment in Time when the traveler will
move even if in that precise instant the traveler has not moved
yet. Since the concept of simultaneity had been put aside,
Einstein considered Time to be the same while Space instead had
Also, this same scientist erroneously believed that all colors
in the light spectrum travel at the same speed. Much confusion
comes from these approximations.
Einstein's theory defined the Universe in one closed Space which
is neither expanding nor contracting, as one static Universe.
That is opposite to what we have learned a few years later by
the redshift, or that an accelerating Universe exists in
Modern scientists have introduced Standard Model and String
theory but still today these two remain inconclusive when
attempting to explain how the Universe was created from those
conditions. In their theories, these scientists are trying to
explain the Creation with atomic particles already existing at
the time of the Big Bang.
The contradictions originate from Einstein's faulty conclusions
and from the reverence shown by scientists too afraid to take a
new stand which is not aligned with the late scientist. Einstein
believed that one fixed number of atoms had always existed and
that atoms did not originate from waves.
From Einstein's hypothesis is reported that energy and matter
are analogous but that energy transfers through two separate
mechanisms: particles and waves. This erroneous division shows
two forms of energy, particles and waves, as if they were not
Recently, the concept of a particle is under new scrutiny in
light of experiments which have shown the smallest particles to
behave just like waves.
Wave particle duality is the concept that all matter and energy
exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior. One of the
effects of this theory is that photons can be calculated to have
frequency, wavelength, amplitude, and other properties inherent
in wave mechanics.
In this context, Wavevolution fundamentally differs from the
Wave-particle duality in the sense that while this last theory
considers the photons as particles behaving like waves instead
in Wavevolution waves transform into particles.
In Wavevolution, waves and particles are interchangeable and
there is only one mechanism to transfer all energy; that is
In some regards, the progress of science came to a halt since
1927 when the credibility of Quantum Mechanics and the concept
of causality were placed in doubt.
That year in Copenhagen, the scientist Heisenberg introduced the
“uncertainty principle” and according to this it is not possible
to exactly determine at the same Time the Space and Movement of
a particle. The problem is that to obtain an exact position
occupied in Space, for example, by an electron it takes the use
of short wavelengths which transfer to the electron a great
amount of energy turning that electron unpredictable and
uncontrollable. Instead, to obtain a precise account of the
Movement of the electron it takes a very small amount of light
(very long wave) which results in a poor definition of the
position in Space of that particle. The more exact and defined
is the Space of a particle the more difficult is to know its
Movement and vice versa.
Heisenberg manifested his frustration in the inability to
determine the exact position of an electron and with his
"uncertainty principle" it was then decided that what could not
be observed with human eye it will not be part of science.
Instead, the fact that we can not observe the exact Space and
Movement of one electron should not imply that the electron does
not occupy one position in Space. It is evident that our
knowledge occurs through the perception of our senses but it
should be equally evident that One World exists and It is
independent from our senses.
The philosophy of Subjectivism from Bohr, Einstein and
Heisenberg believes that when one electron or one photon is not
observed it does not have any position and its position becomes
materialized only as consequence of one human observation.
In the name of all science, this arrogant assumption was sealed
by these three scientists since 1927 and made into a "law".
One new Progressive Science will have to take on a more relevant
role before Humankind could see the first light of a new dawn.
concept “Always” is unimaginable for us because it is beyond our
limited concept of Time.
In fact, could you possibly imagine any existence or event that
has not changed in the past, that is still happening at present
and that will continue to exist unchanged also in the future?
Everything seems to have a beginning and an end, with only one
Only the movement of Quantum mechanics is eternal and unchanged.
This movement fragments and Always recombines all energy
according to one same criteria: symmetry.
is the concept of this Divine instrument (Quantum mechanics)
which connects one dimension limited by Time, Space and Movement
(the expanding Universe) with One infinite Dimension like the
infinite Void which is exempt from these same 3 concepts.
eternal Movement of the Quantum mechanics allows the Universe to
concept “Always” transports in Time the concept of “Now” making
both concepts unreachable and ephemeral.
“Now” is already past when is thought or even pronounced.
“Now” does not exist in the present, past or future, confirming
the illusion of the trilogy of Time.
Democracy has its origin in Greece with the concept of “Agora”
or City where the citizens standing in the squares voted the
laws to express the will of their society. Today it is
unthinkable the use of a square for such a purpose, instead, we
have “representatives” of the people which, through a mandate,
approve and abrogate the laws often without the knowledge of the
citizens. The difference between the original concept of
Democracy and its current counterpart is in the direct
participation, knowledge and expressed will of the citizens,
today very marginal.
until recently we needed to have such representatives to
legislate, today, through the Internet, we could think of a new
concept of square as a pulpit where each law could be exposed
and analyzed by all people before an electronic vote.
Commutalism is a new concept of Democracy without politicians
which is organized through the Internet and balances the needs
of the Individual with the Respect for Equality.
In Commutalism, the citizens would vote directly for the laws
and not the politicians. In other words, instead of voting in
hope that a politician will respect the trust of the citizens to
pass the laws they desired, in Commutalism the citizens
themselves would vote directly for the laws by simply clicking
on a keyboard. Such a form of government would eliminate the
public cost of politicians, and most importantly, the cost of
Different legislative boards composed of private citizens (each
citizen taking turn) could be appointed for various bills of
law. Each proposal could be introduced to public scrutiny via
Internet before being subjected to the majority of the citizens
that can approve it or refuse it. No law could be approved in
conjunction with other laws to avoid any possible social
blackmail. Each law voted separately.
One Police body composed of a larger number of citizens (also
taking turn) could be formed to enforce the laws whenever asked
by the individual citizens. Monetary funds could be allocated
for different social programs and anybody could log in to see
balance sheets and solvency of these funded programs. All laws
would be subjected to periodical review since some of them could
have been approved by a limited number of people paying more
attention when these laws were first introduced or also because
the new law is not in line with all the other laws already
approved. When any citizen believes that a certain law is
damaging his or her own interest a new vote would allow for a
possible change of that law.
Trials now taking place in a Court House could be made public
and undergoing the judgment of those citizens taking their turn. Any
citizen would have the right to vote or not to vote but his or
her right could not be sold nor given to anybody.
This system of laws could manifest for the first time one
Democracy as it was originally intended.
In order to accomplish that, it should be established that all
human beings have the right to enough food and potable water. We
could easily irrigate plantations that could be farmed in some
of the many remote areas of the Planet not yet utilized. Edible
vegetables can be farmed and produced with automated mechanisms
to be prepared, packaged and transported until ready for their
program like this could be funded by a common effort from the
wealth already acquired by all populations. Once it is
established the quantity and quality of all goods needed for
this program, those goods could be transported and exchanged
within a network of markets sharing the natural supplies to
satisfy the existing needs in the different locations of the
Planet. This program, created to sustain everyone, should be in
constant evolution to provide a standard of living in tune with
the contemporary wealth of its time.
All remaining goods (exceeding those allocated to satisfy the
existential needs) could instead be exchanged in a new form of
Capitalism. New and transparent Free Market's rules will be
applied for the trade of all superfluous goods. In regard to the
transfer of private goods or services, every single transaction
would have to be reported on the Net to become visible like an
invoice made public. Each private transaction would be taxed and
simultaneously paid with one same fixed percentage applied for
In such a system, all private properties and their owners like also
all money transactions and trades of private property must be
publicly reported on the Net. This is to prevent unlawful
transactions and root out corruption through the immediate
confiscation of those goods that have not been reported.
Moreover, to reduce Greed and restore the financial equilibrium
worldwide it will be enough to eliminate the concept of
inheritance. The private property of the people will be returned
to the State after the death of each person to be auctioned
among all citizens. People could spend as much as they want to
educate their children but inheritance and donations would not
Therefore, some goods will be private but earned through real
competition and not corruption or favoritism. Once the survival
is guaranteed for everybody there will be no need to be tolerant
with crime as we are today when the same crime is a consequence
of our corrupted system.
In Commutalism, the right to own must be protected and
guaranteed also for those who want to work and trade their own
time to obtain more than just the basic necessities provided by
the system. Those people who will have contributed to the
functioning of the social mechanism and worked to have more than
what is guaranteed will also be able to obtain superfluous
goods. These goods could be placed in a State auction (as if
they were the Treasure bonds of a Country) for a bidding
reserved among those who can dispose of means of exchange gained
through work. Once the goods become privatized they could be
exchanged among the citizens in a market which will be then
transparent and competitive.
If one straight line were seen from both sides it
would already appear to be different. Just like
on a moving train,
the passengers who are sitting next to opposite windows will
experience different scenarios during the same journey. Life
itself is also comparable to a moving train. The past
interactions determine our perceptions in regard to what is in
front of us now.
Besides, each thought corresponds to a specific alignment
of neurons within our brain in a way that is unique and defines
only that particular thought.
For example, when we are hungry, if we were to
observe the behavior of the neurons we would see how these
“little soldiers" position within our brain in the same manner
each time we feel the need to eat.
As in a labyrinth where every door opens many
other doors, every thought originates from a preceding thought
which is also linked to a precise number of other thoughts. For
example, from the thought of a fish we could think of a sea
view, or a seafood dinner or even a movie with sharks but the
following thought would always be associated with it.
Although the thoughts we have during our life
are not all directly linked, all thoughts are connected
indirectly by a far reaching network. Theoretically if we were
to go back indefinitely to the origin of the preceding thought
we could remember our first life experience. In other words, we
could never create a new thought if not by association from past
thoughts or experiences we have lived.
The subconscious is like a warehouse of
memorized experiences each corresponding to a precise neuron
alignment in a certain area of our brain. The subconscious is
very influential to our perceptions. Once we are confronted with
similar situations we recall the memory of that particular
neuron alignment that produces chemicals, give orders to the
muscles and determines our actions without any thinking process.
A parallel mechanism also works for our
consciousness, or our mind. Comparing it to the subconscious,
the mind has a different modus operandi. In its function, our
mind is always influenced by the preceding thought and from that
particular chemical balance that has produced it. Such balance leads our perception and influences
our mind in the next thinking process. For example, if we had just experienced an
emotionally distressed situation we would then start our next
thinking process from a group of neurons already positioned
within our brain and leaning toward a certain behavior. The
neurons, pre-positioned from past thoughts, elaborate the
ongoing events while they are already in a certain chemical balance, or a
certain mood, that will contribute to one given perception for
the current experience. Our perceptions are therefore always
influenced from past experiences and from one preceding chemical
state of mind.
All big surprises create shock because of the
immediate incapability of the neurons to organize and position.
In case of a shock we often notice the consequent “dropped jaw”
from the incapability of the neurons to align in any order
therefore resulting in the total relaxation of the facial
The moment that more than any other will modify
our perceptions is when we believe we are about to die. Each
time we experience extreme situations we will be led to
evaluations that will drastically change our perceptions.